- #IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 32 BIT#
- #IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 UPGRADE#
- #IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 FULL#
- #IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 PRO#
#IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 PRO#
It would be nice if the slider bar actually stated “zoom” on it rather than amount of stabilization.A screenshot of the typical interface on Vegas Pro v10.0ġ2 / May 3, 2012 10 months ago ( ) Just be careful to be very conservative on the adjustments, or you will mistakenly zoom in more than expected. It is a little slow, but having it I suppose is better than not. In fact, what it appears to do is render that portion of a video separately and re creates the clip. Although I have not used it much, I assumed it would be a plug-in. The stabilization for one looked like a nice feature to have. There are of course other new features that are nice. Not all as fast as I had dreamed it to be, but faster is faster.
#IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 UPGRADE#
Whether this is GPU enhanced or not, it is definitely much more efficient!Īll in all I think the upgrade will be worthwhile in my own situation. This is also a great option for a rough draft. Yes I know there is a RAM render option, but an all out render is much more stable, permanent, and capable of being virtually unlimited in size.
#IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 FULL#
What does this mean? For me, I like to render small segments all the time just to see how a finished clip might look while playing smoothly at full resolution.
![is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10 is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gYWq0RZhBAw/maxresdefault.jpg)
m2t renders in Vegas 10 averaged a whopping 38.7% increase! This renders the video in about double real time. Next came the biggest surprise of them all – The 8-bit.
#IS SONY VEGAS 9 MORE STABLE THAT 10 32 BIT#
Vegas pro 9 and 10 both were pretty dead even on the 32 bit renders, 10 averaging only 0.05% faster which could really go either way, and the difference really doesn’t mean much. I am not sure what was changed between the 2 versions of Vegas, but it seems to have become a bit less efficient on the 8-bit render end.ĪGAIN – The average CPU out there may show a more favorable increase when adding GPU power. The GPU option also finished very slightly slower than that Vegas Pro 9 option. While GPU assisted rendering averaged 9.7% faster than the CPU only option, the CPU only option was 11.11% SLOWER than the average 8-bit Vegas Pro 9 render. Not as big of a boost as I had hoped for, but faster none the less.įor rendering an 8-bit. m2ts file – the GPU assisted rendering average was 4.1% faster than CPU only rendering, and 4.8% faster than the. Since I cannot copy and paste from Xcel – and I do not have the time or means at the moment to upload a picture anywhere – I figured the best way to share this data was through video! This is a video forum after all, correct?įor rendering a 32-bit. m2t files were rendered with the default Main Concept 25,000,000 bps format.
![is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10 is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/68/71/ab/6871ab0474ed6d6d5ebf011491e386f3.jpg)
![is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10 is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10](https://www.videohelp.com/softwareimages/vegas_78.jpg)
m2ts files were rendered in the default Sony AVCHD 15,000,000 bps, and the.
![is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10 is sony vegas 9 more stable that 10](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/software/detail-page/B0045IOLHG-1.jpg)
THEREFORE the differences in speed listed here could be MUCH GREATER for someone who has a more common CPU. I am not even sure if Vegas takes advantage of more than one GPU at this point. m2t rendering – even though there was no option to add GPU assist – just to see if there were improvements.īefore really getting into this – keep in mind my CPU is an i7-980x – which is a very high end 6 core desktop processor, and my GPU setup is 2xGeforce 285 GTX in SLI – which is pretty solid, but not top of the line in the GPU world these days. m2ts rendering but also the Main Concept. The only render option that I have seen so far (and there may be more) that has specifically stated a “Use GPU” option is the Sony AVC (.m2ts). m2t file taken off of my HVR-MRC1 recording unit (25MB/s). I used a one minute clip from a recent wedding, I added ONE Color Curve effect, and ONE Color Correction effect to the clip. Vegas Pro 10 arrived today, and I used the trial to test render speeds with using the GPU, CPU and compared them to Vegas Pro 9.0.